Compare brands on a common basis
Review advertisers within the same set of tracked results. This keeps the comparison tied to the buying questions and market your team is actually investigating.
See how recorded ChatGPT ad appearances are shared between your brand and competing advertisers. Compare them within the same prompts, market and tracking period.
Free to start. No card required.
Share of 84 tracked ad appearances across 4 prompts. Rounded to the nearest percent.
A competitor appearance becomes more useful when you can put it in context. Share of voice shows each advertiser’s portion of all the ad appearances Metistic recorded in the tracking you selected.
Review advertisers within the same set of tracked results. This keeps the comparison tied to the buying questions and market your team is actually investigating.
Look at each advertiser’s recorded appearances and the total appearances used in the calculation. A percentage is easier to interpret when the underlying counts are clear.
When comparing periods, check whether the prompt set or market changed. A different share may reflect a change in the selected tracking context as well as a change in recorded ads.
Across four tracked prompts, Metistic recorded 84 ad appearances in this example period. Each brand’s share is its appearances divided by that total.
| Advertiser | Recorded appearances | Share of voice |
|---|---|---|
| Coda | 41 | 49% |
| Aven Audio · Your brand | 27 | 32% |
| Rove Sound | 16 | 19% |
Aven Audio: 27 ÷ 84 × 100 = 32%, rounded
Aven Audio has 32% of these recorded ad appearances. Its ad presence would use completed checks as the denominator instead. Neither metric is a measure of total ChatGPT impressions or advertising spend.
Choose the prompt set, supported market and period. Make sure these match the question your team is trying to answer.
Compare your brand with the advertisers found in those results. Read the counts alongside the percentages rather than treating the share as a standalone score.
Open competitor and prompt-level tracking to understand the distribution. Carry the same context into a report or your next period comparison.
Start with the core tracking views on Free. Paid plans add CSV exports, and Growth includes scheduled PDF reports for regular team and client reviews.
Understand the details before you start tracking.
Tracking & coverageThe denominator is the total number of ad appearances Metistic recorded in the selected tracking results. Each advertiser’s share is its own appearances divided by that total.
Ad presence measures how many completed checks included your brand’s ad. Share of voice measures your portion of all recorded ad appearances. They use different denominators and answer different questions.
No. It is a share within the prompts, market and period you selected. It does not measure all ChatGPT impressions, all advertisers or total advertising spend.
Adding prompts changes the set of results being compared. Those new buying questions may show a different mix of advertisers, which can change the combined shares.
Without recorded ad appearances there is no appearance total to divide between advertisers. Treat that as a “No ads seen” result and inspect the completed checks, rather than interpreting it as a competitive share.
See your ads, your competitors and the gaps across the prompts that matter to your brand.
Free to start. No card required.